There seems to be a constant effort for “some people” to remember their own history. “They” pretend to be objective, and an impartial journalist etc. But then they get that thrill in their leg and they can’t help but let that facade down. Then you get great stories like this one. Equal and Fair really don’t mean the same thing. They may be the opposite sides of the same coin, but I don’t think there is any value in that currency. Render Unto Caesar, I suppose.
The Democratic National Committee emails reporters a lot of stories everyday in an attempt to spin a narrative. The narrative of the week, of course, is the supposedly hateful and violent rhetoric espoused by Obamacare opponents. Paul Krugman’s column today, like most days, can be stitched together from about a dozen DNC emails.
But the most amusing part of Krugman’s column today is his deep concern with the “eliminationist rhetoric” of the GOP:
What has been really striking has been the eliminationist rhetoric of the G.O.P., coming not from some radical fringe but from the party’s leaders. John Boehner, the House minority leader, declared that the passage of health reform was “Armageddon.” The Republican National Committee put out a fund-raising appeal that included a picture of Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, surrounded by flames, while the committee’s chairman declared that it was time to put Ms. Pelosi on “the firing line.” And Sarah Palin put out a map literally putting Democratic lawmakers in the cross hairs of a rifle sight.
All of this goes far beyond politics as usual. Democrats had a lot of harsh things to say about former President George W. Bush — but you’ll search in vain for anything comparably menacing, anything that even hinted at an appeal to violence, from members of Congress, let alone senior party officials.
This is the same Paul Krugman who wrote in December:
“A message to progressives: By all means, hang Senator Joe Lieberman in effigy.”
But heaven forbid Sarah Palin say she wants to “target” certain Democratic seats. For the sake of the republic, we can only hope that John Boehner and those tea party wingnuts refrain from describing election efforts as a “connected series of military operations forming a distinct phase of a war.”
Update: A friend of TWS reminds us that effigies were actually burned at Krugman’s 2008 election party:
Once Obama won the primary, Krugman supported him. Obviously, any Democrat was better than John McCain.
“I was nervous until they finally called it on Election Night,” Krugman says. “We had an Election Night party at our house, thirty or forty people.”
“The econ department, the finance department, the Woodrow Wilson school,” Wells says. “They were all very nervous, so they were grateful we were having the party, because they didn’t want to be alone. We had two or three TVs set up and we had a little portable outside fire pit and we let people throw in an effigy or whatever they wanted to get rid of for the past eight years.”
“One of our Italian colleagues threw in an effigy of Berlusconi.”
“I put out some coloring paper and markers so that people could write stuff on it and throw it into the fire. People really felt like there was stuff they wanted to shed! I had little hats and party whistles.”